21 October, 2009

[Fwd: CJ1001-001 : Judges can be wrong, too]

-------- Original Message --------
Delivered-To: nimerjaber1@gmail.com
Received: by with SMTP id a8cs60494hbg; Wed, 21 Oct 2009
20:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id
u3mr1265265ibh.12.1256180618415; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <PGUIDRY@uccs.edu>
Received: from uccs.edu (webmail2.uccs.edu []) by
mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si18550769iwn.116.2009.; Wed,
21 Oct 2009 20:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of PGUIDRY@uccs.edu designates as permitted sender) client-ip=;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
PGUIDRY@uccs.edu designates as permitted sender)
Received: from <njaber@uccs.edu> by uccs.edu (CommuniGate Pro RULES
5.2.14) with RULES id 102514658; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:03:36 -0600
X-Autogenerated: Mirror
Resent-From: <njaber@uccs.edu>
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:03:36 -0600
Received: from [] (HELO snowwhite3.uccs.edu) by uccs.edu
(CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 102514656; Wed, 21 Oct 2009
21:03:36 -0600
Received: from 96.ecollege.net (96.ecollege.com []) by
snowwhite3.uccs.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9M33XP3014118; Wed,
21 Oct 2009 21:03:34 -0600
Received: from next013w ([]) by 96.ecollege.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:03:33 -0600
Source_Organization: eCollege.PA
Thread-Topic: CJ1001-001 : Judges can be wrong, too
Source_System: SisApi
thread-index: AcpSxD9+wpcOjecCQTiggVv4dgx94A==
Subject: CJ1001-001 : Judges can be wrong, too
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:03:36 -0600
Message-ID: <72EB2786C7B0452B887E59552B9DD854@ecollege.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2009 03:03:33.0330 (UTC)
X-Proofpoint-SPF-Result: error
X-Proofpoint-SPF-Record: v=spf1 ip4: ip4:
mx mx:uccs.edu mx:eas.uccs.edu mx:vast.uccs.edu include:ufp.uccs.edu
include:eas.uccs.edu include:vast.uccs.edu ~allv=spf1 mx
ip4: mx:mail.vast.uccs.edu mx:cortex.vast.uccs.edu
mx:cortex.eas.uccs.edu ~all
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
definitions=2009-10-22_02:2009-09-29,2009-10-21,2009-10-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe

Here is a good story of a judge that should be removed from the bench.
Some of the issues mentioned are things we are currently discussing.


Some Charges Dropped Against Ex-Alabama Judge

*Wednesday, October 21, 2009*




Kidnapping and extortion charges against a former Alabama judge were
dismissed Wednesday, but a jury will deliberate the remaining felony
counts accusing him of paddling and sexually abusing male inmates in
return for leniency.

Circuit Judge Claud Neilson said jurors would hear closing arguments in
the pared-down case against former Mobile Circuit Judge Herman Thomas on
Thursday morning and begin deliberating later in the day.

Thomas, 48, was a community leader in Mobile, serving as a judge for 17
years, a trustee of two universities and an organizer of mentoring
programs for youth. He resigned in 2007 when allegations surfaced that
he spanked defendants with a wooden paddle. Then earlier this year a
grand jury indicted him on charges that he physically and sexually
abusing young male defendants in return for help with their cases.

He originally faced 103 charges involving 15 young men, but prosecutors
dropped four of the men's cases during the trial, and the judge threw
out all ethics charges against him because the statute of limitations

On Wednesday, the judge dismissed kidnapping charges, saying accusations
that Thomas took young men to a private courthouse office for paddlings
didn't constitute kidnapping.

"I don't think kidnapping occurred in the Mobile County courthouse in a
room that is unlocked," he said.

Neilson also threw out the extortion charges accusing Thomas of securing
sexual favors from inmates in return for leniency. He said Alabama's law
involves taking things of value permanently or for a long period, and
taking sexual favors doesn't fit the definition of the law.

"How do you deprive someone permanently of sexual favors?" he asked

Defense attorney Jeff Deen said he was pleased that four-fifths of the
original charges had been dismissed or thrown out, and only 21 charges

Chief Assistant District Attorney Nicki Patterson said the jury would
still consider very serious charges of assault, sexual abuse, attempted
sodomy and sodomy. The last charge is the most serious and carries a
sentence of 10 years to life in prison.

Thomas did not testify in his own defense during the trial. Defense
attorney Robert "Cowboy Bob" Clark said there was no need because of the
lack of credibility of Thomas' 11 accusers.

"They were a bunch of felonious liars," Clark said.

Instead of Thomas defending himself, the defense team spent two days
presenting a Roman Catholic archbishop, two school principals, a
kindergarten teacher and a coach who described how Thomas spent many
hours speaking to school groups and mentoring young people, particularly
those in trouble.

"What else do you want? You want the pope?" Clark told reporters outside
the courtroom.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Your Comments Here!!